Interest Rate Swap

	Members Registration Investors Careers

Become a sponsor »

Interest rate swap (IRS) is an over-the-counter derivative contract in which two counterparties agree to exchange one stream of future interest rate payments for another, based on a specified notional principal amount, over an agreed term — most commonly a fixed interest rate paid by one party in exchange for a floating interest rate received from the other. Unlike a bond or a loan, the notional principal in an interest rate swap is not itself exchanged between the parties; it serves solely as the basis for calculating the periodic cash flows that are exchanged across the life of the contract. Interest rate swaps are widely used for hedging, risk management, and price discovery, and they constitute the largest segment of the global over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives market by notional outstanding amount.

History

The origin of the interest rate swap is traced to August 1981, when the World Bank and IBM entered into the first formally documented swap transaction, arranged by Salomon Brothers. The agreement was structured as a currency swap in which the World Bank issued a U.S. dollar bond and exchanged the resulting dollar payment obligations for IBM's existing Swiss franc and German mark obligations. The World Bank had reached its statutory borrowing limits in Switzerland and West Germany, while IBM held significant debt denominated in those currencies; the transaction allowed each party to access more favorable borrowing terms than it could obtain independently. The swap was settled on August 25, 1981, with the first annual payment made on March 30, 1982.

From that single bilateral transaction, the swap market expanded rapidly throughout the 1980s. The fixed-for-floating interest rate swap — in which one party pays a fixed rate and receives a floating rate pegged to a short-term benchmark — emerged as a distinct product category several years after the 1981 currency swap. In 1985, the World Bank entered into one of the earliest fixed-versus-floating interest rate swaps, with the floating reference rate set to the three-month Treasury bill rate; this structure is now considered the foundational prototype for the modern plain vanilla swap market. The market for these products grew quickly, generating quoted swap rates for a range of maturities that formed the backbone of what became known as the swap curve.

As swap volumes grew, the need for standardized legal documentation became apparent. The International Swaps and Derivatives Association (ISDA) was established in 1984 and published its first Code of Standard Wording, Assumptions and Provisions for Swaps in 1985, updated in 1986. In 1987, ISDA produced three foundational documents: a standard form master agreement for U.S. dollar-denominated interest rate swaps; a standard form master agreement for multi-currency interest rate and currency swaps; and a set of interest rate and currency exchange definitions. These documents allowed market participants to document new transactions by attaching short confirmations to an already-negotiated master agreement, dramatically reducing transaction costs and legal uncertainty. The 1991 ISDA Definitions were subsequently revised and replaced by the 2000 ISDA Definitions as the market continued to evolve.

Throughout the 1990s and into the 2000s, the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) became the dominant floating rate benchmark underpinning the majority of interest rate swap contracts. LIBOR was calculated daily across five currencies — U.S. dollar, euro, Swiss franc, Japanese yen, and British pound — and reported in seven maturities ranging from overnight to twelve months, initially administered by the British Bankers Association and later by ICE Benchmark Administration beginning in 2014.\ By the time of the 2008 financial crisis, the notional outstanding amount of interest rate derivatives had reached hundreds of trillions of dollars, reflecting the instrument's ubiquity across global financial institutions.

Regulatory Reform

The 2008 financial crisis exposed significant structural weaknesses in the OTC derivatives market. The near-failure of American International Group (AIG), which had sold credit default swaps on more than $500 billion in assets without setting aside adequate capital reserves, illustrated how the absence of transparency, central clearing, and margin requirements could generate systemic risk across the financial system. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York extended credit to AIG on September 16, 2008, to prevent a disorderly collapse; the company ultimately received assistance totaling approximately $150 billion from the federal government.

In response to the crisis, Congress enacted the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act in 2010, which brought the OTC derivatives market — including interest rate swaps — under comprehensive federal regulation for the first time. Title VII of Dodd-Frank directed the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) to require mandatory central clearing of standardized swaps and to mandate that certain cleared swaps be executed on a designated contract market (DCM) or swap execution facility (SEF). On November 29, 2012, the CFTC issued its first clearing mandate, requiring that four types of interest rate swaps and two types of index credit default swaps be cleared by registered derivatives clearing organizations; mandatory clearing obligations applied to all banks and financial institutions beginning June 10, 2013.

Swap execution facilities were created by Section 733 of Dodd-Frank to serve as regulated trading platforms on which institutional investors, swap dealers, and eligible contract participants could execute swap transactions. In February 2014, certain categories of interest rate swaps and index credit default swaps became subject to a trade execution requirement, meaning they could no longer be executed bilaterally off-platform but had to be traded on a SEF or DCM. The CFTC subsequently expanded the mandatory clearing list to include swaps denominated in additional currencies in 2016, seeking further alignment with clearing mandates applied in non-U.S. jurisdictions.

LIBOR transition

A separate but consequential development reshaped the interest rate swap market beginning in 2013, when regulatory investigations revealed that panel banks had been manipulating LIBOR submissions. Global investigations resulted in aggregate fines exceeding $9 billion and individual criminal charges against traders at major financial institutions. In July 2017, Andrew Bailey, then chief executive of the Financial Conduct Authority, announced that the FCA would no longer compel or persuade panel banks to submit LIBOR quotes after 2021. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee (ARRC), convened by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York beginning in 2014, identified the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) — based on actual transactions in the U.S. Treasury repurchase market — as the preferred replacement for USD LIBOR.

In January 2022, the standard definition of a U.S. dollar interest rate swap shifted from a LIBOR-based instrument to a SOFR-based instrument for newly executed contracts. All USD LIBOR panel settings ceased on June 30, 2023, completing the benchmark transition. Other major currencies underwent parallel transitions: the sterling overnight index average (SONIA) replaced GBP LIBOR, €STR replaced EUR LIBOR, TONA replaced JPY LIBOR, and SARON replaced CHF LIBOR. The transition required amendments to existing ISDA master agreements on a global scale and presented significant operational, legal, and valuation challenges for market participants.

Mechanics

In a standard plain vanilla interest rate swap, two counterparties agree at inception on a notional principal amount, a fixed rate, a floating rate benchmark, a start date, a maturity date, and a set of payment dates — typically monthly, quarterly, or semiannually. The fixed-rate payer makes periodic payments calculated by multiplying the agreed fixed rate by the notional amount and the applicable day count fraction. The floating-rate payer makes payments based on the prevailing benchmark rate — now most commonly SOFR in the United States — as reset at the beginning or end of each calculation period. Because both legs are denominated in the same currency, only the net difference between the two payment streams is actually exchanged on each payment date.

The market distinguishes among several types of interest rate swaps. A fixed-to-floating swap — referred to as a plain vanilla swap — is the most widely transacted, in which one party receives fixed and pays floating. A floating-to-fixed swap serves the reverse function. A floating-to-floating swap, commonly called a basis swap, involves both parties exchanging variable payments each tied to a different benchmark or tenor, allowing them to manage exposure to differences between indices such as SOFR and SONIA or between one-month and three-month SOFR. Swaptions, which are options on interest rate swaps, give the holder the right but not the obligation to enter into a swap at a predetermined fixed rate on or before a specified expiration date. Zero-coupon swaps exchange a single bullet payment at maturity for a stream of floating-rate payments over the life of the contract.

The swap rate — the fixed rate at which the present value of fixed payments equals the present value of expected floating payments at inception — serves as a key benchmark for pricing. Swap rates across maturities form the swap curve, which financial institutions and corporations use for pricing and valuing a wide range of interest rate derivatives, assessing duration risk, and managing the interest rate sensitivity of balance sheets.

Market size

Interest rate swaps represent the largest single category of OTC derivatives by notional outstanding amount. According to the Bank for International Settlements (BIS), interest rate swap notional outstanding reached $469.2 trillion at mid-year 2024, accounting for 81.1 percent of total interest rate derivative notional outstanding globally. At end-June 2023, the BIS reported that total OTC derivatives notional outstanding reached $715 trillion across all product categories, with interest rate derivatives — dominated by interest rate swaps — accounting for the largest share at $574 trillion.

In terms of daily trading activity, the BIS Triennial Survey of April 2025 found that overnight index swaps — a category of interest rate swap in which the floating rate is a compounded overnight rate such as SOFR or SONIA — had become the most actively traded instrument in the interest rate derivatives complex, with average daily turnover of $5.1 trillion, a substantial rise from $2.1 trillion in 2022. Traditional interest rate swaps recorded average daily turnover of $1.9 trillion in the same survey.

Uses and key users

Interest rate swaps are used by a wide range of financial and non-financial entities to manage interest rate exposure, alter the character of existing liabilities, and facilitate price discovery in fixed income markets.

Corporations use interest rate swaps primarily to convert the interest rate profile of outstanding debt. A company that has borrowed at a floating rate tied to a benchmark such as SOFR may enter into a fixed-to-floating swap — paying fixed and receiving floating — to effectively lock in a fixed borrowing cost and reduce cash flow uncertainty. Conversely, an entity holding fixed-rate obligations may enter the opposite transaction to lower its near-term interest expense if it anticipates falling rates. UK government guidance identifies this as one of the most common corporate applications, noting that a company may find it possible to obtain cheaper effective fixed-rate funding by borrowing at floating rates and layering a swap on top.

Banks constitute one of the most significant categories of interest rate swap users, both as dealers that intermediate swap transactions and as end users managing the interest rate risk inherent in their lending and deposit-taking activities. Because banks tend to originate floating-rate assets (loans) and fund themselves with relatively stable deposits, they face complex duration mismatches that swaps can help address at the loan level, the portfolio level, or across the entire balance sheet. Research conducted by economists at the CFTC, NYU Stern, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York found that the largest 250 U.S. banks held swap positions with an average notional value of $434 billion, though after netting offsetting positions, the average bank's net interest rate exposure from swaps was relatively modest.

Pension funds and insurance companies are major receivers of fixed rates in the interest rate swap market, using swaps to manage the duration of their long-dated liabilities. Pension funds, which must match assets against future benefit payments that can extend decades into the future, use interest rate swaps as a means of extending the duration of their investment portfolios without purchasing long-dated bonds directly. A CFTC study of U.S. public defined-benefit pension plans documented that public pensions use interest rate swaps to mitigate duration risk, with swap usage linked to funding gaps and prevailing swap rates. The 2022 UK gilt market crisis — in which rapidly rising rates triggered margin calls on liability-driven investment strategies employed by pension funds — highlighted the systemic importance of interest rate swap exposure within the pension sector.

Asset managers, hedge funds, governments, and supranational organizations also use interest rate swaps. ISDA's research identifies a broad range of financial end users — including mutual funds, money market funds, insurance companies, building societies, leasing companies, and financial subsidiaries of corporate firms — that employ swap contracts for a variety of hedging and investment purposes. Governments and supranationals may use swaps to reduce interest rate risk on new bond issuance, while proprietary trading firms and hedge funds may take directional or relative-value positions using swaps to express views on the shape or level of the yield curve.

Risk management

Interest rate swaps carry several categories of risk that both market participants and regulators monitor. The primary risk in a swap position is market risk, or the change in the contract's value resulting from movements in the prevailing interest rate environment. Because swap values are determined by the present value of expected future cash flows, even small shifts in the yield curve can produce material mark-to-market gains or losses, particularly on long-dated swaps.

Counterparty credit risk — the risk that the other party to the swap will default on its payment obligations — was a defining concern of the pre-Dodd-Frank bilateral OTC market and a central rationale for the mandatory clearing regime introduced after 2010. Under mandatory clearing, central counterparties (CCPs) such as CME Group's clearing house and LCH interpose themselves between the original counterparties, becoming the buyer to every seller and the seller to every buyer. This substitution of CCP credit for bilateral counterparty credit, combined with margin requirements that ensure both parties post collateral, substantially reduces the default contagion risk that characterized the pre-crisis OTC market.

Liquidity risk — the risk that a party cannot exit or offset a swap position at a reasonable price — is managed in part through the mandatory execution of standardized swaps on SEFs and DCMs, which aggregate bids and offers from multiple participants and promote pre-trade price discovery. Operational and legal risk, including documentation risk under the ISDA master agreement framework, is managed through standardized confirmations and netting arrangements that allow offsetting obligations to be collapsed into a single net payment in the event of a counterparty default.

See also

• Swaps
• Futures
• Options
• Hedging
• Risk management
• Central counterparties
• Benchmark
• Liquidity